Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10
71
Bug Reports / Re: Automatic Update
« Last post by parkd1 on August 20, 2015, 10:36:25 AM »
Welcome.
72
Bug Reports / Re: Automatic Update
« Last post by Jeremy Collake on August 20, 2015, 10:33:06 AM »
Thanks park1d.

The auto-update error I *think* is most likely due to a broken download - though I'm checking to make sure it wasn't a broken package (uploads are verified).

The Support area missing beta download I'll also be fixing in minutes.
73
Bug Reports / Re: Automatic Update
« Last post by parkd1 on August 20, 2015, 10:06:17 AM »
When I got the error it told me to get the whole installer. When I went to get it I get this error.

Not Found

The requested URL /support/temp/20316_x64_8.7.0.1 beta.zip was not found on this server.

Thanks.
74
Bug Reports / Automatic Update
« Last post by parkd1 on August 20, 2015, 09:59:26 AM »
Not sure if this a bug or something wrong with my computer. I get the this error when I do Automatic Update and let it update.
75
Process Lasso / Re: Process Lasso for Audiophiles - New Guide being drafted
« Last post by dtb300 on August 20, 2015, 08:47:07 AM »
Just read through the guide again and it looks good.

Of course you are going to have the user who "specifically" wants YOU to tell them what settings they need for THEIR setup. 

Your statement in the document about not tweaking all the settings, and let PL do the job for you is spot on.

Not sure if it is really noted enough :) - if people want to play, choose CURRENT.  Then if all is well, set in ALWAYS.
76
Process Lasso / Re: EIS 10 Consuming CPU Power Due to PL
« Last post by Jeremy Collake on August 19, 2015, 09:31:50 PM »
Thanks, I've added these to the tamper-proof list as of 8.7.0.3 beta (unreleased), so please let me know how it goes when that version is published (likely tomorrow).
77
Process Lasso / Re: EIS 10 Consuming CPU Power Due to PL
« Last post by XhenEd on August 19, 2015, 07:06:54 PM »
I think your guess that the GUI is triggering EIS's tamper detection is right. Can you give me a run-down of EIS process names? Otherwise, we will of course research ourselves, but this may save time.

Thanks!
a2guard.exe
a2service.exe

a2service.exe is the one that would consume 2-4% CPU power.
78
Bug Reports / Re: Problems in XP 32-bit [One fixed by Options reset, other pending]
« Last post by amid525 on August 19, 2015, 04:53:23 PM »
The system tested by different antivirus scanner. All clear. Tested and integrity of system files. Also fine


I do not understand one thing. What is the fundamental difference between the PL after version 6.0.0.98? What do you fundamentally changed, that everything was so bad for some Xp? You about this that does not speak ...
79
Bug Reports / Re: Problems in XP 32-bit [One fixed by Options reset, other pending]
« Last post by edkiefer on August 19, 2015, 04:37:27 PM »
It all would have been true if 6.0.0.98 and below were the same slow. But it is not, start immediately! 20-30 seconds slower. Video shows all!
And I repeat, the problem is not one of me. Do not blame my software. What is wrong you have done with the latest versions for Xp. We'll have to sit on the 6.0.0.98 (
The problem is we do have XP systems, here and your issue is not happening , so it must be caused by whats loaded on the OS .
that is in simplest terms , I know that doesn't help you directly, but you say other Russian friends are having similar problems, see if you have installed app the same .
your list of tune up and anti mailware/AV is long . I see some you have disabled in pic of startup delay .
I would uninstall all you don't use, check your services for anything running there too as far as tune up utilities , some add services .

Maybe try an run Hijackthis app, there are sites that just help users with these kinds of things (maybe Russian ones too ).

That is about all I can think of now .
80
Bug Reports / Re: Problems in XP 32-bit [One fixed by Options reset, other pending]
« Last post by amid525 on August 19, 2015, 04:01:01 PM »
Quote
Your system has some major problems aside from this:

1. Far too many applications installed with overlapping purposes.
2. More than one security suite. This is an absolute no-no. More than one security suite can cause conflicts, not to mention severe performance degradation. It doesn't make you doubly protected, it just gives you double the trouble. If you want a multi-engine scanner, I suggest herdProtect.

So, I don't believe there's any bug in Process Lasso v8 with regards to how fast it starts after user login. It's at the mercy of all this other stuff you have starting up.
It all would have been true if 6.0.0.98 and below were the same slow. But it is not, start immediately!
Quote
If version 6 truly starts any faster, it is due to a change in the way Process Lasso behaves, and surely the difference is no more than a couple seconds,
20-30 seconds slower. Video shows all!
And I repeat, the problem is not one of me. Do not blame my software. What is wrong you have done with the latest versions for Xp. We'll have to sit on the 6.0.0.98 (
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10