Recent Posts

71

Process Lasso / Re: Gaming Experience

« Last post by AtlBo on May 10, 2013, 02:40:13 AM »

So would Gamesbooster be the answer then or at least a program able to run along side PL's gaming/multimedia mode? Or does it do the same job in that it cuts out process and software thats not required?

I use both but wonder if i only need to use one. PL preferably.

Based on my usages of these two programs, I would recommend both GBoost and JetBoost along side Process Lasso.  GBoost is not a process or service shutdown type of program.  The settings do cause shutdowns, but those are just installed programs.  Native GBoost optimization is more like Process Lasso without the flexibility of configuration.  It restrains in the same way, though, and it is also a heavy lifter in that it is set to perform some pretty deep restraint.  It's not too much though.  The native qualities of JetBoost will be very rarely talked about, because the settings menu is completely based around shutting things down.  However, if you limit the shutdowns to one program process (that you would shut down to play a game, anyway) and study what the program does by itself with no shutdowns selected, it's a pretty amazing program.  It's not as deep a restrainer as GBoost, but it does have the quality of causing resources to be delivered to Explorer.exe in the form of improved mouse and keyboard functions, smoother scrolls, better windows drags, faster folder opens, and more responsive program opens.

I like to think of what these kinds of programs can do as insurance against freezes and malfunctions.  Without a doubt in my opinion, Process Lasso is the supreme entity for improving run-time optimization.  In its own way, it finds a way to control and focus all programs including game optimizers.

I would also say not to overlook Process Lasso's g-booster setting.  It does put a new attitude on the foreground, and, if all your other Process Lasso settings are on the mark, it will give that little extra dimension that can make so much difference when it comes to games...

72

Process Lasso / Re: Process Lasso v6.0.3.23 beta config eaten

« Last post by BenYeeHua on May 10, 2013, 01:46:02 AM »

OT

Ya, the issues that I facing with Explorer.exe is, the IE has some malware active-x or other thing.
When I open My Computer, it will crash because of that, and I fixed it by running IE(No add-on) and reset it.

And when I open a folder with a high bitrate video, it hang because it want to thumbnail that video, which using maybe one core for that.
----
I just thinking that, what is the difference with "Launch folder windows in a separate process", did it reduce leak just like Chrome?
Or it just want to prevent some crash for the main Explorer.exe?

73

Process Lasso / Re: Process Lasso v6.0.3.23 beta config eaten

« Last post by edkiefer on May 09, 2013, 06:42:16 PM »

I rather not have multiple processes . I just tried scrolling though my raw images in picture folder, no slow downs or anything .
Maybe if I had all pics in one folder but I have it set it makes a timestamp folder when I DL from camera to picture folder .

74

Process Lasso / Re: Process Lasso v6.0.3.23 beta config eaten

« Last post by BenYeeHua on May 09, 2013, 06:37:50 PM »

I just checked ,that option is not enabled "Launch folder windows in a separate process"
Like I said if I open multiple folders from my computer I see only 1 explorer process for all folders open .

Its not big deal, I guess he coded it with that flag on .

I think you can try tick/enable it, if you open a folder with many picture/video and scroll with fast speed/one of the video has high bitrate, it(explorer.exe) might be crash by the thumbnailer.

75

Process Lasso / Re: Process Lasso v6.0.3.23 beta config eaten

« Last post by edkiefer on May 09, 2013, 06:27:09 PM »

This show that, every detail is important to report, it don't care it is less or more important. ;)It might be windows used for prevent crash, if it launch by other process instead of Explorer.exe?
As I has "Folder options-Launch folder windows in a separate process" ticked, this is normal for me.

I just checked ,that option is not enabled "Launch folder windows in a separate process"
Like I said if I open multiple folders from my computer I see only 1 explorer process for all folders open .

Its not big deal, I guess he coded it with that flag on .

76

Process Lasso / Re: Process Lasso v6.0.3.23 beta config eaten

« Last post by BenYeeHua on May 09, 2013, 06:14:26 PM »

It's a leftover from an old change to some defaults. I'm going to kill it, thanks for reminding me!

Thanks!

This show that, every detail is important to report, it don't care it is less or more important.

Edit: not sure if this is wrong or right but when I use option , right click on action window "jump to log file on disk" It opens a new explorer process (so you get 2 explorer.exe running) . Closing the folder does bring count back down .
If I open folders normal way 1 explorer can handle all of them  .

It might be windows used for prevent crash, if it launch by other process instead of Explorer.exe?
As I has "Folder options-Launch folder windows in a separate process" ticked, this is normal for me.

77

Process Lasso / Re: Process Lasso v6.0.3.23 beta config eaten

« Last post by edkiefer on May 09, 2013, 05:11:18 PM »

Yes, I see the problem with 'Log application power profile change events'. I will correct that. Thanks!

The application power profiles?

yes app power profile switching . I tested with my default power profile and run game I have it enabled (high performance) and alt-tab and checked no change .

Edit: not sure if this is wrong or right but when I use option , right click on action window "jump to log file on disk" It opens a new explorer process (so you get 2 explorer.exe running) . Closing the folder does bring count back down .
If I open folders normal way 1 explorer can handle all of them  .

78

Process Lasso / Re: Process Lasso v6.0.3.23 beta config eaten

« Last post by Support on May 09, 2013, 05:09:04 PM »

Using v6.4.0.3 beta now.
And I found every start of Process Lasso, the Actions Log will showing Action:action 0x3b, which showing More info:Managing processes for user(s):All users.

That just means there is no string for that action yet. I am slowly adding them, and will disable any that don't have an associated string by final.

I saw a windows jump up and asking me to restore to ProBalance default, or this is caused by the unsaved config?

It's a leftover from an old change to some defaults. I'm going to kill it, thanks for reminding me!

Thanks!

79

Process Lasso / Re: Process Lasso v6.0.3.23 beta config eaten

« Last post by Support on May 09, 2013, 05:07:22 PM »

I am having issue with log setting on power profiles from sticking (its off default, all other logs on)

Yes, I see the problem with 'Log application power profile change events'. I will correct that. Thanks!

Edit : the power profiles don't seem to switch either . I don't see the line in the ini to to edit .

The application power profiles?

80

Process Lasso / Re: Process Lasso v6.0.3.23 beta config eaten

« Last post by edkiefer on May 09, 2013, 04:54:31 PM »

Using v6.4.0.3 beta now.
And I found every start of Process Lasso, the Actions Log will showing Action:action 0x3b, which showing More info:Managing processes for user(s):All users.
----
And did you tweak a bit the default setting?
I saw a windows jump up and asking me to restore to ProBalance default, or this is caused by the unsaved config?

yes, that shows in log when you change managing user in main . think its new log entree that shows on startup